Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 6:36:13 GMT
They languished, expectations for their versions of developmentalism also waned. Throughout this period, ECLAC navigated under different tensions and ambiguities in the face of the developmentalist trials of the st century. She was never an enthusiastic promoter of some of its versions, such as the Bolivarian one, but she still contributed to legitimizing the more moderate ways, such as that of Brazil under Lula da Silva. She did not abandon her own proposals, such as those that in the s postulated “productive transformation” or insertion into commercial globalization.
Beyond the emphases, ECLAC remained faithful to the creed of economic growth as an indispensable engine of development, and placed its hope in certain regulations to reduce poverty Iraq Telegram Number Data and inequality. Economic growth and extractivism Once adherence to economic growth is assured, concessions are made that do not put it at risk. This is the origin of the acceptance of extractivism. In effect, ECLAC supported the concubinage of extractivism with all types of development plans and strategies, conservative or progressive, focusing above all on improving technological management (making them cleaner), increasing the money collected (which would result economically more beneficial), and that citizen protest would be appeased (that they would be less conflictive.
He tolerated extractivism even though this went against ECLAC's early preaching that questioned development based on exporting raw materials. He did so because he hoped that it would allow capital to be accumulated that would in some way serve structural changes and reduce inequality. As a consequence, ECLAC was never a strong voice in denouncing the severe negative consequences. Therefore, it is tremendously striking that now, in , it is recognized that extractivism concentrates wealth, has hardly any technological innovation and is part of that development that failed. All of this is what citizen organizations, a few politicians and a handful of academics have said, for more than a decade, without being recognized by ECLAC.
Beyond the emphases, ECLAC remained faithful to the creed of economic growth as an indispensable engine of development, and placed its hope in certain regulations to reduce poverty Iraq Telegram Number Data and inequality. Economic growth and extractivism Once adherence to economic growth is assured, concessions are made that do not put it at risk. This is the origin of the acceptance of extractivism. In effect, ECLAC supported the concubinage of extractivism with all types of development plans and strategies, conservative or progressive, focusing above all on improving technological management (making them cleaner), increasing the money collected (which would result economically more beneficial), and that citizen protest would be appeased (that they would be less conflictive.
He tolerated extractivism even though this went against ECLAC's early preaching that questioned development based on exporting raw materials. He did so because he hoped that it would allow capital to be accumulated that would in some way serve structural changes and reduce inequality. As a consequence, ECLAC was never a strong voice in denouncing the severe negative consequences. Therefore, it is tremendously striking that now, in , it is recognized that extractivism concentrates wealth, has hardly any technological innovation and is part of that development that failed. All of this is what citizen organizations, a few politicians and a handful of academics have said, for more than a decade, without being recognized by ECLAC.